by
Felix Columbidae
author, poet, journalist, middile east expert, experienced liar
Felix Columbidae
author, poet, journalist, middile east expert, experienced liar
Often those who support the Palestinians make ludicrous assertions about media bias and even go so far as to make outrageous claims that the Israeli government are a bunch of proven psychotic liars. Recent events in Gaza and the Israel prove beyond any reasonable doubt the lack of merit such claims hold.
The above article by the wholly impartial BBC details a dreadful rocket attack in which absolutely no-one at all was hurt. This atrocity is adequately and fairly covered by a BBC journalist who also tells us that the honest Israelis reasonably retaliated with an aircraft strike that injured three militants.
As we know, everyone in Gaza is a militant so that is probably how the pilot was able to state that those injured by the missile launched from his aircraft were definitely militants. The journalist reporting, one would assume from Israel, would have been able to verify this report of the known militancy of the victims because, one would assume, the honest Israeli military media advisors would have affirmed the injured as militant.
Let's be honest ourselves, if they weren't militant before the missile injured them they probably were after they started bleeding. Therefore the report that they were militant, at the time of writing, has to be seen as accurate and responsible journalism.
The report goes on to state that this thoroughly outrageous and unprovoked rocket attack, which fortunately injured no-one, appears to have co-incidentally happened a few hours after a tank opened fire in Gaza and killed a Palestinian, almost certainly a militant. The biased and untrustworthy Palestinians' have suggested that 11 other people were injured including three children. Perhaps this will help to stop the children growing up as militants.
As the report helpfully explains this tank action was the result of militant action:
"The Israeli army said a group of militants had been planting explosives on the border in an attempt to attack their patrols."
Thankfully we receive the full truth of the situation from the Israeli Army so there is no need for any further journalistic enquiry. Clearly it now transpires that there is also a high probability that the children involved were actually militants as well otherwise the tank would never have taken the risk of opening fire with them around.
The unbiased BBC journalism quite rightly leaves the issue of one dead militant, seven injured militants and three injured militant children as covered and then goes on to focus on the damage to the Israeli house. The article adds a description of the type of missile used, information our clever journalist has obviously checked, and includes a shocking picture of a hole in the street. Quite dreadful imagery there as people look into the hole clearly in a state of shock that such damage can wantonly be done to an Israeli road.
Thankfully for transparency and openess the report then goes on to make sure we all understand the truth behind the situation in the Mddle East.
"The Islamist group Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, and Israel had largely halted hostilities since the 2009 war in Gaza, but skirmishes often break out around the border area."
I am sure that many of us will be very grateful to the BBC for the impartial way it clears up the confusion many people feel about this tragic conflict. Like many others I thought that Hamas was the democratically elected government of Gaza, a mistake I have probably gleaned from listening to reports from the discredited and bias reporting of Al Jezeera or the like. Clearly they are just an Islamist Group up to no good and it is best they are reported as such and thus maintain the highest of BBC journalist standards.
We have a lot to thank the editors at the BBC for in their tireless effort to ensure these incredible standards of journalistic craft which are the mainstay of the legend which is BBC impartiality. You would have to be a complete amateur incompetent to represent an Islamist Group as an elected government.
In addition I was labouring under the opinion that the massive mechanised troop assault with full scale state of the art air support against a civilian population, including the use of illegal phosphorus bombing, was a massive breach of Human Rights and International Law. My debt to the impartial BBC and the high journalistic standards it employs only increases as I now realise that the killing of defenceless women and children is actually a legitimate "war". Once again I must have been misled by the false reporting of such suspect organisations such as the United Nations.
This should be an object lesson to us all to be very, very careful about who we listen to and believe. There are a lot of cynical liars out there who will exploit our good faith and try to trick us into believing that in some way Israel is the "bad guy" when it is an innocent democracy, excluding its militant Arab citizens from voting of course, just trying to keep the peace.
There is no greater dishonest broker at the moment than Ken O'Keefe. This well known trouble maker is the same person who assaulted the peace loving forces of the Israeli military and police by hitting his head recklessly against their batons when they tried to save the Mavi Marmara from committing a crime in international waters. You simply cannot trust a word this man says and the recent examples of his reports from Gaza are clearly fabrications made on a film set in downtown Hollywood.
Thankfully again, the BBC tells it like it is! Click on the screenshot below to see the truth about the credibility of BBC reporting.
The BBC; reporting on the Middle East with fairness, openness and transparency, covering all the major issues in the region.
The above article by the wholly impartial BBC details a dreadful rocket attack in which absolutely no-one at all was hurt. This atrocity is adequately and fairly covered by a BBC journalist who also tells us that the honest Israelis reasonably retaliated with an aircraft strike that injured three militants.
As we know, everyone in Gaza is a militant so that is probably how the pilot was able to state that those injured by the missile launched from his aircraft were definitely militants. The journalist reporting, one would assume from Israel, would have been able to verify this report of the known militancy of the victims because, one would assume, the honest Israeli military media advisors would have affirmed the injured as militant.
Let's be honest ourselves, if they weren't militant before the missile injured them they probably were after they started bleeding. Therefore the report that they were militant, at the time of writing, has to be seen as accurate and responsible journalism.
The report goes on to state that this thoroughly outrageous and unprovoked rocket attack, which fortunately injured no-one, appears to have co-incidentally happened a few hours after a tank opened fire in Gaza and killed a Palestinian, almost certainly a militant. The biased and untrustworthy Palestinians' have suggested that 11 other people were injured including three children. Perhaps this will help to stop the children growing up as militants.
As the report helpfully explains this tank action was the result of militant action:
"The Israeli army said a group of militants had been planting explosives on the border in an attempt to attack their patrols."
Thankfully we receive the full truth of the situation from the Israeli Army so there is no need for any further journalistic enquiry. Clearly it now transpires that there is also a high probability that the children involved were actually militants as well otherwise the tank would never have taken the risk of opening fire with them around.
The unbiased BBC journalism quite rightly leaves the issue of one dead militant, seven injured militants and three injured militant children as covered and then goes on to focus on the damage to the Israeli house. The article adds a description of the type of missile used, information our clever journalist has obviously checked, and includes a shocking picture of a hole in the street. Quite dreadful imagery there as people look into the hole clearly in a state of shock that such damage can wantonly be done to an Israeli road.
Thankfully for transparency and openess the report then goes on to make sure we all understand the truth behind the situation in the Mddle East.
"The Islamist group Hamas, which controls the Gaza Strip, and Israel had largely halted hostilities since the 2009 war in Gaza, but skirmishes often break out around the border area."
I am sure that many of us will be very grateful to the BBC for the impartial way it clears up the confusion many people feel about this tragic conflict. Like many others I thought that Hamas was the democratically elected government of Gaza, a mistake I have probably gleaned from listening to reports from the discredited and bias reporting of Al Jezeera or the like. Clearly they are just an Islamist Group up to no good and it is best they are reported as such and thus maintain the highest of BBC journalist standards.
We have a lot to thank the editors at the BBC for in their tireless effort to ensure these incredible standards of journalistic craft which are the mainstay of the legend which is BBC impartiality. You would have to be a complete amateur incompetent to represent an Islamist Group as an elected government.
In addition I was labouring under the opinion that the massive mechanised troop assault with full scale state of the art air support against a civilian population, including the use of illegal phosphorus bombing, was a massive breach of Human Rights and International Law. My debt to the impartial BBC and the high journalistic standards it employs only increases as I now realise that the killing of defenceless women and children is actually a legitimate "war". Once again I must have been misled by the false reporting of such suspect organisations such as the United Nations.
This should be an object lesson to us all to be very, very careful about who we listen to and believe. There are a lot of cynical liars out there who will exploit our good faith and try to trick us into believing that in some way Israel is the "bad guy" when it is an innocent democracy, excluding its militant Arab citizens from voting of course, just trying to keep the peace.
There is no greater dishonest broker at the moment than Ken O'Keefe. This well known trouble maker is the same person who assaulted the peace loving forces of the Israeli military and police by hitting his head recklessly against their batons when they tried to save the Mavi Marmara from committing a crime in international waters. You simply cannot trust a word this man says and the recent examples of his reports from Gaza are clearly fabrications made on a film set in downtown Hollywood.
Thankfully again, the BBC tells it like it is! Click on the screenshot below to see the truth about the credibility of BBC reporting.
The BBC; reporting on the Middle East with fairness, openness and transparency, covering all the major issues in the region.
0 comments:
Post a Comment