Today in the Royal Courts of Justice the Lord Chief Justice denied an innocent man his freedom, a grieving family their son and the taxpayer the release from the burden of paying for injustice. There is no doubt that there is a fine legal argument why the conclusive evidence of this man's innocence could not be presented in court. Equally, there are other case precedents where a duty solicitor without murder charge experience represents a client charged with that serious crime. As the pre-notified media gathered their footnote story of law satisfied and left to post their copy who asked questions about why an innocent man remains in jail whilst a murderer walks free? Who asks why taxpayers are funding miscarriage of justice and paying for a criminal to wander our streets?
Click on image to play video


0 comments:
Post a Comment