Saturday, 15 January 2011

Simon Hall and Solomon Disatisfied

The case of Simon Hall is not one that challenges the intellect of justice but it clearly challenges the judgment of judges. How is it that the word indistinguishable tests minds paid very well by the taxpayer to be astute?

Today in the Royal Courts of Justice the Lord Chief Justice denied an innocent man his freedom, a grieving family their son and the taxpayer the release from the burden of paying for injustice. There is no doubt that there is a fine legal argument why the conclusive evidence of this man's innocence could not be presented in court. Equally, there are other case precedents where a duty solicitor without murder charge experience represents a client charged with that serious crime. As the pre-notified media gathered their footnote story of law satisfied and left to post their copy who asked questions about why an innocent man remains in jail whilst a murderer walks free? Who asks why taxpayers are funding miscarriage of justice and paying for a criminal to wander our streets?


Click on image to play video

0 comments:

Post a Comment